|  |  
     |  |    
 
               
                |  | 2 
                  OF 3 |  |   At 
              the beginning of the seventeenth century, the Ottoman Empire was 
              still the most powerful state in the world both in wealth and military 
              capability. The personal style of government, however, cultivated 
              among the earlier Sultans had gone away completely. In place of 
              Sultanic government, the bureaucracy pretty much ran the show. Power 
              struggles among the various elements of the bureaucracy: the grand 
              Vezir , the Diwan , or supreme court, and especially the military, 
              the Janissaries, led to a constant shifting of government power. 
              Islamic historians point out that the growth of bureaucratic power 
              and the disinterest of the Sultans led to corrupt and predatory 
              local government which eroded popular support. Western historians 
              point to internal decline in the bureaucracy along with increased 
              military efficiency of European powers as the principle reason for 
              the decline of the Empire. However it may be, the decline of the 
              Ottomans was a staggered affair lasting over two centuries. The 
              Empire itself would exist until World War I, at which point it was 
              finally erased from the maps by European powers.
 Perhaps the most significant innovation in Sultanic 
              government was the preservation of the brothers of the Sultan. While 
              Sultanic succession is hotly disputed among both Islamic and Western 
              historians, it seems clear that the Ottomans believed that the Sultan 
              was selected primarily through divine kut , which in Turkish means 
              "favor." All the members of the ruling family, according 
              to some historians, had an equal claim to the throne. This explains 
              the Ottoman practice of killing the brothers of the Sultan and their 
              sons; the purpose of this practice was to obviate rebellion or rival 
              claims to the throne. In the late sixteenth century, the Ottoman 
              Sultans abandoned this practice, yet still distrusted filial loyalty. 
              So the brothers of the Sultan were locked away in the harem in the 
              palace. While they lived in luxury, they were still forced to live 
              in small rooms and often in isolated conditions. the Sultans abandoned 
              the practice of training their sons to assume the Sultanate by having 
              them serve in the government and the military. In both Islamic and 
              Western histories of the Ottomans, this decline in the Sultanate 
              is regarded as one of the prime causes of its decline.  As a result of the disintegration of the instituion 
              of the Sultanate, power had to go somewhere. It principally went 
              to the Janissaries, the military arm of the government. Throughout 
              the seventeenth, the Janissaries slowly took over the military and 
              administrative posts in  the 
              government and passed these offices on to their sons, mainly by 
              bribing officials. Because of this practice, Ottoman government 
              soon began to be ruled by a military feudal class. Under the early 
              Ottomans, position in the government was determined solely through 
              merit. After the sixteenth century, position in government was largely 
              determined by hereditary. The quality of the administration and 
              bureaucracy declined precipitiously. 
               
                |  | 2 
                  OF 3 |  |  |  |